Xref: utzoo comp.arch:3992 comp.compilers:214 comp.sys.m68k:826
Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!necntc!ima!johnl
From: michael@hao.UCAR.EDU (Michael Schmidt)
Newsgroups: comp.arch,comp.compilers,comp.sys.m68k
Subject: Re: GCC, SUN LD, suggestions about debugging multiprocessors
Message-ID: <915@ima.ISC.COM>
Date: 19 Mar 88 00:43:05 GMT
References: <910@ima.ISC.COM>
Sender: johnl@ima.ISC.COM
Reply-To: michael@hao.UCAR.EDU (Michael Schmidt)
Followup-To: comp.arch
Distribution: na
Organization: Uni-GH Paderborn, FB17/Informatik
Lines: 29
Keywords: GCC SUN LD multi-processors
Approved: compilers@ima.UUCP
In-Reply-To: harvard!rutgers!umn-cs!uucp@BBN.COM


In article <910@ima.ISC.COM>, harvard!rutgers!umn-cs!uucp@BBN writes:
>I suppose we could get around this by
>hand coding 68000 assembly code into the relatively few appropriate places
>in the GCC source and using #ifdef mc68000.  Has anyone got any other 
>suggestions before we do this?

You may want to get GCC 1.18. As quoted from the man page:

                -m68000
                  Generate output for  a  68000  (rather  than  a
                  68020).


>We have commonly used Motorola format however and wondered if 
>someone has built up the translation tables to interrept MOT opcode 
>mnemonics rather or in addition to MIT format.

Same as above. The GCC 1.18 has a compile time switch to generate
Motorola format.
--
    Michael Schmidt, Universitaet-GH Paderborn, FB 17, Warburger Str.100,
                     D-4790 Paderborn, West Germany
                 z.Zt.: University of Colorado, Boulder
Mail:   michael@boulder.UUCP      or      michael@boulder.Colorado.EDU
--
Send compilers articles to ima!compilers or, in a pinch, to Levine@YALE.EDU
Plausible paths are { ihnp4 | decvax | cbosgd | harvard | yale | bbn}!ima
Please send responses to the originator of the message -- I cannot forward
mail accidentally sent back to compilers.  Meta-mail to ima!compilers-request