Xref: utzoo comp.lang.c:8399 comp.sys.ibm.pc:13503
Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!uwvax!rutgers!rochester!ur-tut!hwfe
From: hwfe@ur-tut (Harlan Feinstein)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c,comp.sys.ibm.pc
Subject: Re: C declaration styles
Message-ID: <1465@ur-tut.UUCP>
Date: 22 Mar 88 02:06:30 GMT
References: <5699@watdragon.waterloo.edu> <1065@sask.UUCP>
Reply-To: hwfe@tut.cc.rochester.edu.UUCP (Harlan Feinstein)
Organization: Univ. of Rochester Computing Center
Lines: 25

In article <1065@sask.UUCP> coleman@sask.UUCP (Geoff Coleman @ College of Engineering) writes:
>> 
>>           void foo(int x, double y)
>
>	Could you please tell us what kind of PC (if not an MS-DOS)
>and what kind of compiler you ate using. The above isn't Lattice
>or Microsoft and I would be suprised if it is Turbo.
>

Sure enough, you shall be surprised.  That's Turbo C syntax.  It will also
accept the more commonly acceptable method of argument syntax, but you have
the option of doing it the above way.  I use the style illustrated here, as
it's easier for me to remember, having done most of my C work with Turbo C.

Disclaimer:
If what I say seems wrong or offends you, consider this: I'm writing in my
own language, not English, and it's coincidence that it looks like English.
 
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
          Exiting the universe without a passport and other offenses
    punishable by death can be appealed on the second Tuesday of each week.
 
Harlan Feinstein                       hwfeccss@uorvm.bitnet
Student, University of Rochester
------------------------------------------------------------------------------