Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!yale!cmcl2!arizona!cjeffery
From: cjeffery@arizona.edu (Clinton Jeffery)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.misc
Subject: Re: From Modula to Oberon
Message-ID: <4494@megaron.arizona.edu>
Date: 25 Mar 88 04:53:25 GMT
References: <1217@PT.CS.CMU.EDU>
Organization: U of Arizona CS Dept, Tucson
Lines: 17

From article <1217@PT.CS.CMU.EDU>, by ralphw@IUS3.IUS.CS.CMU.EDU (Ralph Hyre):
> ...Other than interoperability with certain existing code, I can't
> see any reason to use C when CLU is available.]

	Oh great, another person who can't see any reason to use a
	'low level' language instead of a _real_language_! :-)

<<I admit in advance I am *only* a student, and have not programmed in CLU;
  before anyone flames me, here's the real reason for this posting:>>

From reading a CLU paper, the language appears FANTASTIC--do any free
implementations exist??  I *AM* interested in source code if available...
Thanks in advance for any pointers.
-- 
+--------------
| Clint Jeffery, University of Arizona Department of Computer Science
| cjeffery@arizona.edu -or- {ihnp4 noao}!arizona!cjeffery
+--------------