Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!ncar!ames!pasteur!ucbvax!BRANDEIS.BITNET!SUTTON From: SUTTON@BRANDEIS.BITNET Newsgroups: comp.os.vms Subject: And the winner is... NOBODY! Message-ID: <8803211452.AA00266@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU> Date: 16 Mar 88 15:26:00 GMT Sender: usenet@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU Organization: The Internet Lines: 33 I think that it's time for Barry and Erland and any other snobs out there to cool it a bit. There are a lot of different operating systems (and editors) out there and every one of them has at least one fanatic enthusiast. I often get very weary of proclamations stating that operating system x,y or z is the ultimate system for every one's needs, talents, wishes, budgets, etc. And although the likes of Barry and Erland might insist that their arguments are based on purely empirical evidence, their choice of words and even the choice of subject heading (Barry's choice, I believe) are clearly packed with emotion. There are strengths and weaknesses in both systems. The general user who just wants to run a data base or graphics program might find themselves confounded by the short, often cryptic commands and error messages of the UNIX system. The knowledgable computer hacker might find VMS to be too verbose or too troublesome to customize to their likes. Operating systems are meant to SERVE people and both UNIX and VMS do this admirably although in different ways for different needs. I personally think that the more interesting innovations in OS's have come about as a result of the Macintosh PC revolution. Everyone seems to be jumping on the windows and pull down menus bandwagon from micros to minis to mainframes, even VMS and UNIX. I feel that this might well be the place where not only these two OS's will meet, but many. I guess if that time comes, we'll all be arguing whether a pull down menu should pop open with or without a mouse click. SUTTON@BRANDEIS.BITNET