Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!bloom-beacon!gatech!udel!burdvax!sdcrdcf!trwrb!aero!venera.isi.edu!cracraft
From: cracraft@venera.isi.edu (Stuart Cracraft)
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.tcp-ip
Subject: Re: Bridge Communications TCP/IP 20000
Message-ID: <5103@venera.isi.edu>
Date: 23 Mar 88 18:56:26 GMT
References: <1035@uni2.bcm.tmc.edu>
Reply-To: cracraft@venera.isi.edu.UUCP (Stuart Cracraft)
Organization: Information Sciences Institute, Univ. of So. California
Lines: 13
Keywords: BRIDGE CS/1 TCP

In article <1035@uni2.bcm.tmc.edu> sob@bcm.tmc.edu (Stan Barber) writes:
>Until recently, I was only marginally satisfied with the Bridge product. Now,
>I am quite pleased with it. My only major remaining complaint is the lack
>of support for a non-proprietary system logging function. I have suggested
>that they make their log information available to the unix syslog function.
>I hope they will.
>
>Stan Barber, Baylor College of Medicine
>
I'll second the kudo for Bridge. It's a good, solid product. We've
had smooth operation from it.

	Stuart