Xref: utzoo comp.sources.bugs:859 comp.bugs.misc:102
Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!lll-winken!lll-lcc!ames!pacbell!att-ih!att-cb!cblpf!cblpn!jsc
From: jsc@cblpn.ATT.COM (Jonathan Cassell)
Newsgroups: comp.sources.bugs,comp.bugs.misc
Subject: Re: Rolodex bugs
Message-ID: <557@cblpn.ATT.COM>
Date: 18 Mar 88 18:15:41 GMT
References: <1094@mimir.dmt.oz>
Reply-To: jsc@cblpn.ATT.COM (55214-Jonathan Cassell)
Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories - Columbus, Ohio
Lines: 15
Keywords: Rolodex bugs

In article <1094@mimir.dmt.oz> paz@mimir.dmt.oz (Paul Zemancheff) writes:
>
>	Re: My previous news item.  " strchr() " is a function, not a variable.
>The code for this function does not appear ( at least I can't find it.) in any
>of the sources  ...
>
>Paul Zemancheff		      PHONE: +61 3 487 9263

If you add "-Dstrchr=index" to your compile line, you will probably 
eliminate the problem.  strchr() is functionally equivalent to index(),
as is strrchr() to rindex(). Your libraries probably contain index() and
rindex().  An irritating, but minor, BSD/ATT-BL inconsistency.


	jonathon cassell
	cblpn!jsc