Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!lll-winken!lll-lcc!well!ewhac
From: ewhac@well.UUCP (Leo 'Bols Ewhac' Schwab)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga
Subject: Re: SDB: What no menus?
Message-ID: <5550@well.UUCP>
Date: 28 Mar 88 02:00:57 GMT
References: <1028@pur-phy> <935@rmi.UUCP> <7901@oberon.USC.EDU>
Reply-To: ewhac@well.UUCP (Leo 'Bols Ewhac' Schwab)
Organization: First National Sperm Bank:  Your future is in your hands.
Lines: 27
Summary: We don't need no steenking deebugger...

In article <7901@oberon.USC.EDU> papa@pollux.usc.edu (Marco Papa) writes:
>After having used SDB for over a month to debug 2 commercial programs
>I concur with the above quote and more: I think SDB is the best thing
>that was invented after sliced bread :-)  [ ... ]  At
>this point in time, any commercial developer that is NOT using SDB is
>clearly shooting himself in the foot, [ ... ]

SmugSelfRighteousMode (ON);

	I have never encountered a bug that I couldn't have discovered by
taking a good, studious look at the source code.

	Further, I have never encountered a debugger that didn't introduce
more problems than it solved.

	Conclusion:  Debuggers are for weenies.

	So there.  Nyahh!  PTHhptbhptbhtptbhpbtbhpttt!!!		:-)

[ This myopic view of debuggers is brought to you by near-sighted programmer
with a fashion sense only 400 years out of date whose only exposure to
debuggers were those available on the C-64. ]

_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_
Leo L. Schwab -- The Guy in The Cape	ihnp4!ptsfa -\
 \_ -_		Recumbent Bikes:	      dual ---> !{well,unicom}!ewhac
O----^o	      The Only Way To Fly.	      hplabs / (pronounced "AE-wack")
"Work FOR?  I don't work FOR anybody!  I'm just having fun."  -- The Doctor