Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!mailrus!ames!pasteur!ucbvax!MTUS5.BITNET!JCKASPER
From: JCKASPER@MTUS5.BITNET
Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple
Subject: BITNET mail follows
Message-ID: <8803280429.aa11352@SMOKE.BRL.ARPA>
Date: 28 Mar 88 09:16:00 GMT
Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Organization: The Internet
Lines: 27

Date:         Mon, 28 Mar 88 04:15:02 EST
From:         "John C. Kasperski" <JCKASPER@MTUS5>
Subject:      SHRConvert...
To:           "Anyone that can help..." <Info-Apple@brl.arpa>

    Is anyone else having any problems with the new ProTERM (2.0)?  The Kermit
protocal and the mainframe Kermit protocal here at Michigan Technological
University don't seem to agree totally.

    As fas as downloading, there is no problems... it's the uploading where the
two disagree.  Uploading works, except for sending the last block.  Either the
mainframe here doesn't like what it's getting in this last block or Kermit
doesn't like the reply its getting back.  Does anyone know what the problem
might be.  I tried changing every single option on our mainframe, but nothing
has worked.  I know that I'm not the only one who has this problem... a friend
of mine in North Dakota told me he was having the exact same problem.

Does any one know what's wrong or how to fix it?

      John C. Kasperski, "Jc"                        JCKASPER @ MTUS5

                      Michigan Technological University


p.s.: The other protocal's (X-Modem Standard, at least) seem to be working ok.
      And I'd love to use it with the mainframe... but Kermit is the only thing
      that our mainframe supports.