Xref: utzoo misc.legal:4273 comp.sys.ibm.pc:13473 comp.sys.mac:14244 comp.sys.apple:4760 comp.sys.atari.st:8465 comp.sys.hp:551 comp.sys.amiga:16414 Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!bloom-beacon!mit-eddie!uw-beaver!cornell!rochester!ur-tut!aptr From: aptr@ur-tut (The Wumpus) Newsgroups: misc.legal,comp.sys.ibm.pc,comp.sys.mac,comp.sys.apple,comp.sys.atari.st,comp.sys.hp,comp.sys.amiga Subject: Re: Apple Challenges HP New Wave, MS-Windows, Potentially OS/2 PM Message-ID: <1457@ur-tut.UUCP> Date: 21 Mar 88 17:02:50 GMT References: <5480@well.UUCP> <5492@well.UUCP> Reply-To: aptr@tut.cc.rochester.edu.UUCP (The Wumpus) Organization: Univ. of Rochester Computing Center Lines: 26 Keywords: Apple Mac HP Microsoft Windows OS/2 New Wave Frivolous Litigation Apple is either getting cockey or just plain stupid. Do they really think they can take on both HP and Microsoft? After all, the technology they are talking about was developed by Xerox in the seventies. (I actually had a chance to play with one of the Xerox systems in 1982 when they wer about to be replaced.) The person responsible for developing the Mac enviorment came from Xerox PARC. Apple decided (or rather Jobbs decided) to hire him because they had tried to write a system on their own and had really botched it. My father was at PARC (Palo Alto Research Center) the day Jobbs hired the guy (I can not think of his name). Jobbs came in in the morning and in the afternoon, the guy walked out with Jobbs, never to work for Xerox again. Apparently, Jobbs made an offer the guy couldn't refuse. Any one want to see Xerox sue the pants off of Apple? One other point should be made. When Apple sued Digital Research, Inc over GEM, most of the board of DRI was on the board at Apple. No wonder DRI settled out of court. I really doubt if HP or Microsoft would settle out of court. -- The Wumpus UUCP: {cmcl2!decvax}!rochester!ur-tut!aptr BITNET: aptrccss@uorvm Internet: aptr@tut.cc.rochester.edu Disclaimer: "Who? When? Me? It was the Booze!" - M. Binkley