Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!uwvax!oddjob!gargoyle!att-ih!occrsh!uokmax!rob
From: rob@uokmax.UUCP (Robert K. Shull)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac
Subject: Re: CMS Pro80II/i vs. Pro102k-II/i Disks
Message-ID: <1131@uokmax.UUCP>
Date: 23 Mar 88 18:31:03 GMT
References: <987@aucs.UUCP>
Reply-To: rob@uokmax.UUCP (Robert K. Shull)
Distribution: na
Organization: University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK
Lines: 15

In article <987@aucs.UUCP> peter@aucs.UUCP (Peter Steele) writes:
(about the CMS drive)
>speed, is there anything else that makes the 102M drive "inferior" to
>their 80M drive. Its tempting to get, but if its noisy or has some
Three of us here have the CMS 102 internal. Unfortunately, we haven't
received our Mac II's yet so I can't tell you how the drive runs. I
can tell you though that the drive is a half-height made by Rodime.
(Someone else will have to tell you whether that's good or bad, and
I don't know who makes their 80 meg drive)
	Robert
-- 
Robert K. Shull
University of Oklahoma, Engineering Computer Network
ihnp4!occrsh!uokmax!rob		CIS 73765,1254		Delphi	RKSHULL
Opinions contained herein in no way reflect those of the University of Oklahoma.