Xref: utzoo comp.unix.questions:6307 comp.unix.wizards:7436
Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!uwvax!oddjob!ncar!noao!arizona!lm
From: lm@arizona.edu (Larry McVoy)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.questions,comp.unix.wizards
Subject: Re: RFS vs. NFS
Message-ID: <4566@megaron.arizona.edu>
Date: 29 Mar 88 01:38:10 GMT
References: <326@ivory.SanDiego.NCR.COM> <275@ksr.UUCP> <7556@brl-smoke.ARPA> <4188@chinet.UUCP> <17056@beta.UUCP> <10186@ulysses.homer.nj.att.com>
Reply-To: lm@megaron.arizona.edu (Larry McVoy)
Distribution: na
Organization: University of Arizona, Tucson
Lines: 9

In article <10186@ulysses.homer.nj.att.com> ekrell@hector (Eduardo Krell) writes:
>And AT&T is not trying to lock you into AT&T products by pushing RFS;
>there are a lot of non AT&T boxes running System V Release 3 and RFS.

Truth in advertising, please.  How about a list of those boxes?  Maybe 
people will see the light and start to take RFS seriously?
-- 

Larry McVoy	lm@arizona.edu or ...!{uwvax,sun}!arizona.edu!lm