Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!seismo!sundc!pitstop!sun!decwrl!hplabs!hp-sdd!ucsdhub!jack!sdeggo!dave
From: dave@sdeggo.UUCP (David L. Smith)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.wizards
Subject: Re: What does SVR3 have that SVR2 doesn't?
Message-ID: <182@sdeggo.UUCP>
Date: 18 Mar 88 19:04:28 GMT
References: <1062@maynard.BSW.COM> <10161@ulysses.homer.nj.att.com> <16603@beta.UUCP>
Organization: Lazy Programmer's Society of San Diego
Lines: 16

In article <16603@beta.UUCP>, hwe@beta.UUCP (Skip Egdorf) writes:
> Let us not forget the lawyers:
> 
> 5. A clause in the license that lets AT&T decide to pull your product
>    whenever THEY decide that you are not really selling SVR3.

Is this just if you're calling your product Sys V.3, or if you are selling
something derived from Sys V.3 (and not calling it such) and they decide they
don't like it?


-- 
David L. Smith
{sdcsvax!jack,ihnp4!jack, hp-sdd!crash, pyramid, uport}!sdeggo!dave
sdeggo!dave@amos.ling.edu 
Sinners can repent, but stupid is forever.