Xref: utzoo comp.unix.questions:6314 comp.unix.wizards:7446
Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!mailrus!nrl-cmf!ames!pasteur!ucbvax!ulysses!hector!ekrell
From: ekrell@hector.UUCP (Eduardo Krell)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.questions,comp.unix.wizards
Subject: Re: RFS vs. NFS
Message-ID: <10192@ulysses.homer.nj.att.com>
Date: 29 Mar 88 13:52:05 GMT
References: <326@ivory.SanDiego.NCR.COM> <275@ksr.UUCP> <7556@brl-smoke.ARPA> <4188@chinet.UUCP> <17056@beta.UUCP> <10186@ulysses.homer.nj.att.com> <4566@megaron.arizona.edu>
Sender: netnews@ulysses.homer.nj.att.com
Reply-To: ekrell@hector (Eduardo Krell)
Distribution: na
Organization: AT&T Bell Labs, Murray Hill
Lines: 18

In article <4566@megaron.arizona.edu> lm@megaron.arizona.edu (Larry McVoy) writes:
>
>Truth in advertising, please.  How about a list of those boxes?  Maybe 
>people will see the light and start to take RFS seriously?

These are the ones I've personally played with:

	Counterpoint
	Motorola
	NSC
	Bell Technologies

I'm sure there are more. There was an RFS demo among at least these vendors
plus AT&T at the summer Uniforum in Phoenix last year.
    
    Eduardo Krell                   AT&T Bell Laboratories, Murray Hill, NJ

    UUCP: {ihnp4,ucbvax}!ulysses!ekrell		ARPA: ekrell@ulysses.att.com