Xref: utzoo comp.unix.microport:337 comp.unix.xenix:1791 comp.unix.questions:6282 comp.unix.wizards:7406
Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!rutgers!rochester!cornell!uw-beaver!mit-eddie!husc6!mailrus!umix!uunet!steinmetz!davidsen
From: davidsen@steinmetz.steinmetz.ge.com (William E. Davidsen Jr)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.microport,comp.unix.xenix,comp.unix.questions,comp.unix.wizards
Subject: Re: UUCP Problems
Keywords: UUCP XENIX
Message-ID: <10126@steinmetz.steinmetz.ge.com>
Date: 27 Mar 88 22:25:31 GMT
References: <1113@csuna.UUCP>
Reply-To: davidsen@crdos1.UUCP (bill davidsen)
Organization: General Electric CRD, Schenectady, NY
Lines: 18

In article <1113@csuna.UUCP> abcscnge@csuna.UUCP (Scott "The Pseudo Hacker" Neugroschl) writes:
| When attempting to run UUCP from a IBM XENIX 1.0 system to an SCO
| XENIX V 2.2.1 system, the IBM system calls up and logs in, and the
| SCO system responds with
| 
| Shere
| 
| and then times out the IBM system.  I also can't seem to get 2 IBM 1.0 systems
| to talk via UUCP.  Any suggestions?

Having spent several weeks finding a similar problem, I would suspect
parity is the problem. Particularly if the call working in one direction
and not the other. If that's the case let me know, I think I have the
solution to the problem.
-- 
	bill davidsen		(wedu@ge-crd.arpa)
  {uunet | philabs | seismo}!steinmetz!crdos1!davidsen
"Stupidity, like virtue, is its own reward" -me