Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!seismo!sundc!pitstop!sun!amdahl!drivax!alexande
From: alexande@drivax.UUCP (Mark Alexander)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.misc
Subject: Re: 3 button systems (was  A/UX window systems, Mac toolbox, etc)
Message-ID: <3224@drivax.UUCP>
Date: 18 Mar 88 20:05:34 GMT
References: <9790@steinmetz.steinmetz.UUCP> <13650003@hpsmtc1.HP.COM>
Reply-To: alexande@drivax.UUCP (Mark Alexander)
Organization: Bob-ist Temple of Monterey
Lines: 16

In article <13650003@hpsmtc1.HP.COM> dlw@hpsmtc1.HP.COM (David Williams) writes:
>DRI was guilty of being lazy, they should have gone to Xerox in
>the first place and come out with something superior to the Apple interface
>and not merely a pale clone.

Actually, DRI did a graphical interface before GEM that was quite
different, or so I've been told by people who saw it.  These same
folks said it was better than the Mac-clone GEM turned out to be.  It
sounded to me like GEM was another case of what happens to a good
product when marketing geniuses get their hands on it.

Disclaimer: everything in this posting is probably wrong, including
this disclaimer.
-- 
Mark Alexander	(UUCP: amdahl!drivax!alexande)
"Bob-ism: the Faith that changes to meet YOUR needs." --Bob