Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!lll-winken!lll-lcc!ames!nrl-cmf!ukma!gatech!udel!burdvax!sdcrdcf!trwrb!trwspp!spp2!urban
From: urban@spp2.UUCP (Michael Urban)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.x
Subject: Re: icons, conventions.
Message-ID: <320@algol.spp2.UUCP>
Date: 28 Mar 88 15:47:16 GMT
References: <8803241512.AA22721@tub.UUCP> <8803241853.AA11973@LYRE.MIT.EDU>
Reply-To: urban@algol.UUCP (Michael Urban)
Organization: TRW Inc., Redondo Beach, CA
Lines: 15

In article <8803241853.AA11973@LYRE.MIT.EDU> swick@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Ralph R. Swick) writes:
>The default option table in the X Toolkit uses '-iconic' to request of
>the window manager that the application be started iconified, though this
>was inadvertently left out of the Toolkit documentation.

And, as I noted in an earlier message,
it is rather frustrating that the default
option table does not also include an
-icongeometry argument that would let
someone give a hint to the window manager
of where the tool's icon belongs!
-- 
   Mike Urban
	...!trwrb!trwspp!spp2!urban 

"You're in a maze of twisty UUCP connections, all alike"