Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!yale!cmcl2!nrl-cmf!ames!pasteur!agate!jiff!silverio
From: silverio@jiff.berkeley.edu (C J Silverio)
Newsgroups: news.admin
Subject: Re: Does Ford really have a better idea?
Message-ID: <8023@agate.BERKELEY.EDU>
Date: 25 Mar 88 21:36:34 GMT
References: <136@ccd700.UUCP> <7962@agate.BERKELEY.EDU> <148@ccd700.UUCP>
Sender: usenet@agate.BERKELEY.EDU
Reply-To: silverio@jiff.UUCP (C J Silverio)
Followup-To: talk.bizarre
Distribution: na
Organization: Math Dept., UC Berkeley
Lines: 31
Summary: well, they certainly don't have a car I'd ever buy


>> You won't find BMGSs lining up to work for Ford Climate Control.  Never.
>
>Matt, your posting has nothing to do with the issues being discussed.
>Why did you post it? 

Because it was relevant to your weak flaming, Sitek old man.
 
>point of mine. So, failing that, you resort to flaming Ford. And a
>pretty feeble one at that.  I suggest that since you have nothing to
>add that is remotely germane to this discussion, or this newsgroup, and
>since I certainly don't have to defend the most profitable corporation 
>on Earth to you, we terminate this right now.

Snicker snicker.  Is it possible to defend Ford?  Or is Sitek copping
out? 

>Jim Sitek

Anyway, Sitek, as you have the wit to notice,
this is an inappropriate forum.  I wonder why you posted 
here in the first place, but let's leave that issue 
for now.  If you feel you have a legitimate point
to defend, follow us elsewhere, to leave the Real Admins
in peace to do Real Work.

And, BTW, "mister" is a term of respect, and hence 
not applicable to you, sirrah.


ucbvax!brahms!silverio	C J Silverio/Brahms Gang/Berkeley CA 94720