Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!ukma!david From: david@ms.uky.edu (David Herron -- Resident E-mail Hack) Newsgroups: news.software.b Subject: Re: news software speedup Message-ID: <8741@e.ms.uky.edu> Date: 30 Mar 88 23:51:29 GMT References: <649@bms-at.UUCP> <10150@ncc.UUCP> <4246@hoptoad.uucp> <10128@steinmetz.steinmetz.ge.com> <4265@hoptoad.uucp> <2090@ho95e.ATT.COM> Reply-To: david@ms.uky.edu (David Herron -- Resident E-mail Hack) Organization: U of Kentucky, Mathematical Sciences Lines: 18 In article <2090@ho95e.ATT.COM> wcs@ho95e.UUCP (46323-Bill.Stewart.,2G218,x0705,) writes: >Is it really necessary to retain message-IDs past about 14 days? The >news.lists postings indicate 99% of everything reaches uunet in 5 days; >surely there aren't too many 15-day-long loops any more? Probably better >to keep the expire time down and tolerate the <.1% duplication load. >(Admittedly, one reason there aren't many delay loops is that the >backbone machines probably keep a lot of history.) For ho95e, the >retention limit is forced on us by ulimit; we get history file overflows >if we keep records longer than 11 days, and VOLUME is up. I had the chance recently to be looking closely at what news was coming through the system and saw "quite a bit" of stuff which was over a month old. -- <---- David Herron -- The E-Mail guy <---- or: {rutgers,uunet,cbosgd}!ukma!david, david@UKMA.BITNET <---- <---- I don't have a Blue bone in my body!