Xref: utzoo comp.sys.ibm.pc:13459 news.sysadmin:613 Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!ccicpg!turnkey!conexch!root From: root@conexch.UUCP (Larry Dighera) Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc,news.sysadmin Subject: Re: will someone.. Message-ID: <221@conexch.UUCP> Date: 20 Mar 88 17:42:12 GMT References: <290@wybbs.UUCP> <3903@cup.portal.com> Reply-To: root@conexch.UUCP (Larry Dighera) Organization: The Consultants' Exchange, Orange County, CA. (714) 842-6348 Lines: 35 Summary: System Administrators of public access sites should qualify users In article <3903@cup.portal.com> Thyss@cup.portal.com writes: >will someone please re send dmgbbs? i see it look's pretty nice and i'm in >the lookout for a bbs program, so if the person that put it up in the first >place could re-upload it, i'd be grateful. thanks, >-- >Thyss@cup.portal.com Let me see if I understand the content of this posting correctly. Thyss wants the original poster to go through the trouble of re-posting the multi-part package s/he just recently posted. Thyss further would like all that binary code to circulate through out the world and reside in duplicate on all the machines on the net. Could this be Thyss's intent? Wouldn't it have been more courteous to have posted an email message directly to the author of DMGBBS and made arrangements to obtain a copy directly from the author or an archive site? If Thyss had done that, we wouldn't have had to read his impertinent request, and s/he wouldn't have embarrassed him/herself by suggesting that every site on the net contain two copies of the multi-hundred-kilobyte binary posting. Perhaps sysadmins of public-access sites should educate their users in the proper use of Usenet before granting them the ability to post articles? Larry Dighera -- USPS: The Consultants' Exchange, PO Box 12100, Santa Ana, CA 92712 TELE: (714) 842-6348: BBS (N81); (714) 842-5851: Xenix guest account (E71) UUCP: conexch Any ACU 2400 17148425851 ogin:-""-ogin:-""-ogin: nuucp UUCP: ...!ucbvax!ucivax!icnvax!conexch!root || ...!trwrb!ucla-an!conexch!root