Xref: utzoo talk.politics.misc:8506 sci.misc:1092
Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!uwvax!oddjob!mimsy!aplcen!aplcomm!stdc.jhuapl.edu!jwm
From: jwm@stdc.jhuapl.edu (James W. Meritt)
Newsgroups: talk.politics.misc,sci.misc
Subject: Re: The Last Word on Friedman, Sevener, and Cuba
Message-ID: <136@aplcomm.UUCP>
Date: 22 Mar 88 13:43:31 GMT
References: <3405@bloom-beacon.MIT.EDU> <3895@whuts.UUCP> <3588@bloom-beacon.MIT.EDU> <3904@whuts.UUCP> <1570@osiris.UUCP>
Sender: news@aplcomm.UUCP
Reply-To: jwm@stdc.jhuapl.edu.UUCP (James W. Meritt)
Organization: The Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory
Lines: 20

In article <1570@osiris.UUCP> dredd@osiris.UUCP (Gaziggity B. Yazghizzer) writes:
>
>Ok you hosers. I have just returned from Key West and I asked a fair number
>of the local people whether you can see Cuba, even on the clearest of days.
>The answer was/is a unanimous NO (maybe from the air, but no chance from land).


Sounds good to me!  Good sample size ("fair number"), varying conditions
("even on" implies "including less than") identical geology (dirts moves
REAL slow) and no political bias (I guess.  Maybe nobody wants to look
at Cuba....)

One experiment beats a thousand good theories!  (personal opinion)



Disclaimer: Individuals have opinions, organizations have policy.
            Therefore, these opinions are mine and not any organizations!
Q.E.D.
jwm@aplvax.jhuapl.edu 128.244.65.5