Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!bloom-beacon!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!mailrus!ames!pasteur!agate!garnet!weemba
From: weemba@garnet.berkeley.edu (Obnoxious Math Grad Student)
Newsgroups: sci.misc
Subject: Re: Bias on IQ tests
Message-ID: <8100@agate.BERKELEY.EDU>
Date: 29 Mar 88 05:02:21 GMT
References: <59@avsd.UUCP>
Sender: usenet@agate.BERKELEY.EDU
Reply-To: weemba@garnet.berkeley.edu (Obnoxious Math Grad Student)
Organization: Brahms Gang Posting Central
Lines: 10
In-reply-to: govett@avsd.UUCP (David Govett)


In article <59@avsd.UUCP>, govett@avsd (David Govett) writes:

>IQs are good predictors of one thing: the likelihood that a person
>will tell you his/her IQ.

For those who want an amusing example, Gene Ward Smith and I differ
by ~50 points in IQ.  Beyond that, I'm not saying--they're about as
meaningful as our astrological signs.

ucbvax!garnet!weemba	Matthew P Wiener/Brahms Gang/Berkeley CA 94720