Xref: utzoo alt.flame:1846 rec.arts.startrek:10647 Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!lll-winken!gryphon!richard From: richard@gryphon.CTS.COM (Richard Sexton) Newsgroups: alt.flame,rec.arts.startrek Subject: Re: Drooling trekkies (was: Star Drek punk rubbish) Message-ID: <3158@gryphon.CTS.COM> Date: 5 Apr 88 17:46:40 GMT Reply-To: richard@gryphon.CTS.COM (Richard Sexton) Followup-To: rec.arts.startrek Organization: Trailing Edge Technology, Redondo Beach, CA Lines: 146 Keywords: SEXTON followups In article smeyer@topaz.rutgers.edu (Seth Meyer) writes: >In article <3122@gryphon.CTS.COM> richard@gryphon.CTS.COM (Richard Sexton) writes: >>In article <38117COK@PSUVMA> yer mama writes: >>>smeyer@topaz.rutgers.edu (Seth Meyer) drools profusely: >>>>Did we have a bad day Dr. Robert Tech? >>>>3) You could make a posting to rec.arts.startrek asking them not to >>>> cross-post 'SIXTEEN FOLLOWUPS' to talk.bizzare. >>> >> >>Just what the FUCK do you against my followups ? Where does this moron >>get off thinking followups are ok as long as they ARNT a SEXTON followup ? > >Okay, Richard...its okay...take it easy...start at 10 and count down >to one and take deeeeep breaths...very good. > >Now grow up. > >>Egads, the gall of some people. > >Egads, the immaturity of some people. > (Putting on a trish kind of voice) So like, is this guy Mr. Maturity or what ? Perhaps this will help: I refuse to litter every one of my postings with dozens of those fucking ":-)"'s just to appease people whose parody detectors are out of commission. Trust me, when I mean to insult you, you'll KNOW. -James Wilbur Lewis In article <923@ddsw1.UUCP> karl@ddsw1.UUCP (Karl Denninger) writes: >In article <38117COK@PSUVMA> yer mama writes: >$smeyer@topaz.rutgers.edu (Seth Meyer) drools profusely: u (Seth Meyer) says: >$ >$>In article <1547@ut-emx.UUCP> legare@ut-emx.UUCP (Dr. Robert Tech) writes: >$ >$[A wonderful artistic use of the words "F#$@HEADS." The spacing he used >$managed to convey a sense of desperation mingled with anger _perfectly_.] > >$[A large rant] > > >Yes, I cross-posted this to talk.bizarre intentionally. >Aha! So you were one of the people who cross-posted. Jeezus ! How'd you figure it out ? >Karl, it has come to my attention that there are a few people who >don't like your cross-posting onto talk.bizarre. Although I really >have no problem with this, I wanted to tell you, since it appears Thats right seth old buddy. You just wanted to tell Karl something. And you couldnt use email, oh no no no. Out of Estamps friebd ? Hey, no probs. Talk.bizarre worked out a deal with the post office and you can buy estamps there now. Go buy some. Use them. >You '.startrek people'... Do you always generalize people from a few >of their group? This is very dangerous, Cindy, and very prejudiced. Yes, you startrek people. Whats the difference between a "startrek people" and a rock ? Me either. In article <4552@chinet.UUCP> rissa@chinet.UUCP (Patricia O Tuama) writes: >Someone else we've never heard of writes: >>> Perhaps we're redundant. Do you realize that there are only 17 original >>> story settings and everything written is based on one of those? >>Actually it would seem that there are only 17 original postings >>and you all there in SF spend all your time rushing about from >>one to another continuously following-up the same things over >>and over again. >Let me ask you this darling: Did you start to notice how people in >talk.bizarre, within 24 hours, have followed up to my posting more >times than any other posting in rec.arts.startrek (within 24 hours). iIn flaming me, you have accomplished the very thing you were flaming >me for. Just where do you get off asking trish a hard question ? Hard questions are why we fucking well read t.b, to get away from hard questions. Especially real fucking hard ones. Please ask somebody who gives a fuck. >> Please don't bother flaming me. I'll be mature enough not to pay attention >>> to this twice. Hang on, let me get this right. You bumble in here, flame away and then say "please dont flame me ?" Hmm, can you say "neophyte" Well, again, me either. But since you are obviously new here let me help you, youngster. Try: flames to dev/null or please flame me. Now look you star trek people, I really hate to make threats, but if this "seth" creature is the best you've got, you're in trouble. We have these two things which we affectionatly call "nowak" and "talmadge" if if you arnt carefull, they will all of a sudden develop a real strong intrest in star trek. They will post. My god how they will post. They will post till tears run down your leg. You volume will go up up up. You will be the #1 group on all of USENET. Jim Sitek will then suggest that the startrek group should be cut off. Then nowak, talmadge and probably this "seth" creature will argue wildly in news.admin and star trek will get cut off from many sites, including new mexico. Is this what you want ? Good. Keep it up. In the meantime, some things to ponder: 1) Why is spocks blood green ? 2) What color are the "yellow" uniforms ? 3) What is the accepted list of abbreviations ? 4) Why is Kirk such a meanie ? 5) Are spock and kirk really gay ? 6) Why are the red-shirts the first to go ? There that should keep your tiny minds amused. It has for the last 10 years. -- Remember me. Mangle my muffin. richard@gryphon.CTS.COM rutgers!marque!gryphon!richard