Path: utzoo!hoptoad!amdcad!decwrl!labrea!agate!ucbvax!ucsd!sdcsvax!ucsdhub!hp-sdd!hplabs!otter!cwp
From: cwp@otter.hple.hp.com (Chris Preist)
Newsgroups: alt.individualism
Subject: Re: tell us please
Message-ID: <5430007@otter.hple.hp.com>
Date: 11 Apr 88 13:35:10 GMT
References: <5540@spool.cs.wisc.edu>
Organization: Hewlett-Packard Laboratories, Bristol, UK.
Lines: 19


The fact that you, as an individualist (I assume?) ask such a question,
dissapoints me. Did he claim there was a RIGHT philosophical system?

A philosopher's job is to analyse and criticise, not just dogmatise.

Finding a flaw in a 'proof' (Mathematical or philosophical) is usually
an easier task than forming the proof itself. It is, nonetheless, equally 
important. 

Or maybe by RIGHT you mean the opposite to LEFT, politically? :-)

Agitate, Educate, Disorganise.....                Chris Preist


P.S. Don't forget, this group is for discussing INDIVIDUALISM and associated
paraphernalia. I would beg you, professor, not to rise to the bait and
provide an alternative philosophical framework for us to discuss. Except in
the unlikely event it is an alternative individualist philosophy...