Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!lll-winken!lll-tis!ames!claris!apple!bcase
From: bcase@Apple.COM (Brian Case)
Newsgroups: comp.arch
Subject: Re: For a good time, read...
Message-ID: <7876@apple.Apple.Com>
Date: 8 Apr 88 22:15:46 GMT
References: <7841@apple.Apple.Com> <2006@ingr.UUCP>
Reply-To: bcase@apple.UUCP (Brian Case)
Organization: Apple Computer Inc, Cupertino, CA
Lines: 12

In article <2006@ingr.UUCP> proctor@ingr.UUCP (John Proctor) writes:
>The previously quoted EE Times article is interesting from several points of
>view:
>
>All in all, the article had very little to do with performance issues as it
>failed to pinpoint architectural features and their performance impact both
>positive or negative! It was also guilty of very selective quoting thus 
>placing doubt over the validity of the whole article.

Right;  I want to say that I didn't mean to pick on the Clipper; it is
obvious to me that the 18 times slower number is really far-fetched; and
also, I didn't mean for anyone to think that I thought this article has
any validity.  I just found it amusing and thought others would too.