Xref: utzoo comp.lang.c:9316 comp.arch:4341
Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!lll-winken!lll-tis!ames!ll-xn!mit-eddie!bbn!bbn.com!emiller
From: emiller@bbn.com (ethan miller)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c,comp.arch
Subject: Re: Bit Addressable Architectures
Message-ID: <23396@bbn.COM>
Date: 14 Apr 88 14:46:07 GMT
References: <11702@brl-adm.ARPA> <243@eagle_snax.UUCP> <2245@geac.UUCP> <8646@eleazar.Dartmouth.EDU> <877@cresswell.quintus.UUCP>
Sender: news@bbn.COM
Reply-To: emiller@bbn.com (ethan miller)
Organization: BBN Labs (Cambridge, MA)
Lines: 20
Summary:

Expires:

Sender:

Followup-To:

Keywords:


In article <877@cresswell.quintus.UUCP> ok@quintus.UUCP (Richard A. O'Keefe) writes:
=>In article <8646@eleazar.Dartmouth.EDU>, major@eleazar.Dartmouth.EDU (Lou Major) writes:
=>> char foo[]="This is a test.";
=>> sizeof (foo) == sizeof (char *)
=>> NOT the number of machine bytes/words those characters take up. (16, for most
=>> typical installations)
=>
=>Wrong.  The answer *is* 16.  This is one of the few cases where
=>foo and &(foo[0]) are different.  I _tried_ this to make sure I was right.
=>That's always a good idea.

Sure is.  What did you try?  _I_ just tried printing foo and &(foo[0]), and
they are the same.  BTW, I also tried sizeof (foo), and it is 16.

ethan
*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*
Ethan Miller			   | "If they don't keep on exercising
BBN Laboratories (Cambridge, MA)   |  their lips, he thought, their brains
ARPAnet: emiller@bbn.com           |  start working."
Disclaimer: BBN didn't write this. |   -- The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy
*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*