Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!seismo!esosun!ucsdhub!jack!nusdhub!rwhite
From: rwhite@nusdhub.UUCP (Robert C. White Jr.)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.lans
Subject: Re: NFS vs RFS
Message-ID: <934@nusdhub.UUCP>
Date: 30 Mar 88 20:11:38 GMT
References: <724@uel.uel.co.uk>
Organization: National University, San Diego
Lines: 21

in article <724@uel.uel.co.uk>, andrew@uel.uel.co.uk (Andrew Josey) says:
> In article <184@quick.COM>, srg@quick.COM (Spencer Garrett) writes:
>> RFS runs ONLY on SYS V 3.2
>   ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> also 3.0 and 3.1

My 3.1.1 System will be shocked when it finds out,
	All this time and it's been a criminal ;-)

Rob.

<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
<<  All the STREAM is but a page,<<|>>	Robert C. White Jr.		   <<
<<  and we are merely layers,	 <<|>>	nusdhub!rwhite  nusdhub!usenet	   <<
<<  port owners and port payers, <<|>>>>>>>>"The Avitar of Chaos"<<<<<<<<<<<<
<<  each an others audit fence,	 <<|>>	Network tech,  Gamer, Anti-christ, <<
<<  approaching the sum reel.	 <<|>>	Voter, and General bad influence.  <<
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
##  Disclaimer:  You thought I was serious???......  Really????		   ##
##  Interogative:  So... what _is_ your point?			    ;-)	   ##
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^