Xref: utzoo comp.os.vms:5662 comp.dcom.lans:1240
Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!bloom-beacon!gatech!mcnc!ecsvax!tpmsph
From: tpmsph@ecsvax.UUCP (Thomas P. Morris)
Newsgroups: comp.os.vms,comp.dcom.lans
Subject: Emulex Performance 4000's?
Message-ID: <4918@ecsvax.UUCP>
Date: 12 Apr 88 20:27:04 GMT
Organization: UNC Educational Computing Service
Lines: 19
Keywords: LAT Terminal Server experiences

Does anyone have actual experience with the new Emulex Performance
4000 LAT terminal servers? Any beta-testers out there? Anyone who
is using the product now? The UNC School of Public Health is __very__
seriously considering the purchase of the emulex servers in preference
over the DEC DECserver 200's and DECserver 500's. For comparable
configurations (~352 terminal connections) for our new building, the
Emulex product comes out about $10,000 - $15,000 (US) less expensive
than DEC. And if these servers work as well as advertised, they will
be quite a buy! 

Any information, dirt, or war-stories would be welcome, as would any
information concerning success, ease of use, known bugs, emulex
responsiveness, etc.

-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tom Morris                                 BITNET: TOM@UNCSPHVX
UNC School of Public Health                UUCP  : ...!mcnc!ecsvax!tpmsph
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------