Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!ccicpg!turnkey!stanton!donegan
From: donegan@stanton.TCC.COM (Steven P. Donegan)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Re: hayes 9600 vs. trailblazer
Message-ID: <9@stanton.TCC.COM>
Date: 11 Apr 88 22:52:10 GMT
References: <8804110136.AA16978@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU>
Organization: Stanton Public Domain Systems, Stanton, Ca.
Lines: 13
Summary: V.32 - Not normally for terminals

In article <8804110136.AA16978@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU>, RAF@NIHCU.BITNET ("Roger Fajman") writes:
> might want to consider V.32 modems.  They are truly 9600 bps full
V.32 modems are normally used for synchronous devices, such as IBM protocols
and X.25 protocols. To use a V.32 modem with a terminal or pc will require a
sync to async converter in most cases. The cost for a quality V.32 modem is
still prohibitive when compared to a Trailblazer or Hayes 9600 ($500 to several
$k more expensive).

-- 
Steven P. Donegan
Sr. Telecommunications Analyst
Western Digital Corp.
donegan@stanton.TCC.COM