Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!cmcl2!brl-adm!brl-smoke!gwyn From: gwyn@brl-smoke.ARPA (Doug Gwyn ) Newsgroups: comp.lang.c Subject: Re: typedef laxity Message-ID: <7614@brl-smoke.ARPA> Date: 6 Apr 88 15:35:53 GMT References: <1070@maynard.BSW.COM> Reply-To: gwyn@brl.arpa (Doug Gwyn (VLD/VMB) ) Organization: Ballistic Research Lab (BRL), APG, MD. Lines: 10 Keywords: typedef lint In article <1070@maynard.BSW.COM> campbell@maynard.BSW.COM (Larry Campbell) writes: >It seems to me someone should complain about this code: Ok, if it makes you happy I'll complain about it. >Does anyone know of a lint or compiler that will complain about it? No, you appear to have a misperception regarding typedef. It does not introduce a new type, but rather just a synonym for an existing type. This is intentional, sorry.