Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!mailrus!nrl-cmf!cmcl2!brl-adm!adm!dsill@NSWC-OAS.arpa
From: dsill@NSWC-OAS.arpa (Dave Sill)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: ANSI rationale has possibly garbled line
Message-ID: <12846@brl-adm.ARPA>
Date: 6 Apr 88 19:59:32 GMT
Sender: news@brl-adm.ARPA
Lines: 16

Larry Cipriani writes:
>On page 53 of the rationale (or is that rationalization?) the
>first sentence of 3.5.3.1 says "A pointer declarator may NOW its
>own type qualifiers, to specify the ..." (emphasis mine). This
>seems messed up, any ideas for what the correct wording is?

How about:
"A pointer declarator may now HAVE its own type qualifiers..."

[Based on October '86 wording.]

=========
The opinions expressed above are mine.

"PostScript is the new ASCII."
					-- Bill Joy