Xref: utzoo comp.lang.c:9104 comp.arch:4308
Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!cmcl2!brl-adm!brl-smoke!gwyn
From: gwyn@brl-smoke.ARPA (Doug Gwyn )
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c,comp.arch
Subject: Re: Bit Addressable Architectures
Message-ID: <7647@brl-smoke.ARPA>
Date: 10 Apr 88 08:46:46 GMT
References: <11702@brl-adm.ARPA> <243@eagle_snax.UUCP> <2245@geac.UUCP> <7578@brl-smoke.ARPA> <1040@mcgill-vision.UUCP>
Reply-To: gwyn@brl.arpa (Doug Gwyn (VLD/VMB) <gwyn>)
Organization: Ballistic Research Lab (BRL), APG, MD.
Lines: 8

In article <1040@mcgill-vision.UUCP> mouse@mcgill-vision.UUCP (der Mouse) writes:
-In article <7578@brl-smoke.ARPA>, gwyn@brl-smoke.ARPA (Doug Gwyn ) writes:
-> There's a lot of code like that, no question.  It would continue to
-> work if sizeof(char) were allowed to be other than 1,
-How could it?

Naturally, if you truncate the explanation by stopping at the "," then
you missed it.  Why do people narrow their focus to such small contexts?