Xref: utzoo comp.lang.c:9203 comp.unix.wizards:7731
Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!cmcl2!brl-adm!brl-smoke!gwyn
From: gwyn@brl-smoke.ARPA (Doug Gwyn )
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c,comp.unix.wizards
Subject: Re: command line options
Message-ID: <7662@brl-smoke.ARPA>
Date: 12 Apr 88 12:49:08 GMT
References: <2414@zyx.UUCP> <8039@elsie.UUCP> <7628@brl-smoke.ARPA> <143@gsg.UUCP> <7652@brl-smoke.ARPA> <192@sdeggo.UUCP> <7658@brl-smoke.ARPA> <21471@bu-cs.BU.EDU>
Reply-To: gwyn@brl.arpa (Doug Gwyn (VLD/VMB) <gwyn>)
Organization: Ballistic Research Lab (BRL), APG, MD.
Lines: 7

In article <21471@bu-cs.BU.EDU> bzs@bu-cs.BU.EDU (Barry Shein) writes:
>Howsabout '-=' ?

This, as well as -, -. -: -_ -+ -~ -@ -# -% -^, should trip the usage
message in the majority of getopt()-based utilities.  Use the one that
makes you happiest (presumably the one that interacts least with your
shell).  I'll stick to -? myself.