Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!bloom-beacon!gatech!hubcap!ncrcae!ncr-sd!se-sd!rns
From: rns@se-sd.sandiego.NCR.COM (Rick Schubert)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: standards development process
Message-ID: <1509@se-sd.sandiego.NCR.COM>
Date: 12 Apr 88 22:22:21 GMT
References: <10314@tut.cis.ohio-state.edu>
Reply-To: rns@se-sd.sandiego.NCR.COM (Rick Schubert)
Organization: NCR Corp. Systems Engineering, San Diego
Lines: 9
Keywords: /* I don't want to scare anyone away with the real keyword */
Summary: Don't condemn a langauge because of a feature you don't plan to use.

In article <10314@tut.cis.ohio-state.edu> lvc@tut.cis.ohio-state.edu (Lawrence V. Cipriani) writes:
> ...
>Actually, as long as noalias was removed I would be content (but not
>overjoyed) to use ANSI-C.  

When and if there is an ANSI C Standard that contains "noalias", feel
free to write programs that do not contain the token "noalias".

-- Rick Schubert