Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!lvc
From: lvc@tut.cis.ohio-state.edu (Lawrence V. Cipriani)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: standards development process
Message-ID: <10511@tut.cis.ohio-state.edu>
Date: 13 Apr 88 20:37:15 GMT
References: <10314@tut.cis.ohio-state.edu> <1509@se-sd.sandiego.NCR.COM>
Organization: The Ohio State University Dept of Computer and Information Science
Lines: 17
Keywords: /* boo */

In article <1509@se-sd.sandiego.NCR.COM> rns@se-sd.sandiego.NCR.COM (Rick Schubert) writes:
>In article <10314@tut.cis.ohio-state.edu> lvc@tut.cis.ohio-state.edu (Lawrence V. Cipriani) writes:
>> ...
>>Actually, as long as noalias was removed I would be content (but not
>>overjoyed) to use ANSI-C.  
>
>When and if there is an ANSI C Standard that contains "noalias", feel
>free to write programs that do not contain the token "noalias".

Certainly, but I will have to deal with code that I did not
write that contains "noalias".  After all, most of a programmers
work is in maintenance not development.

-- 
Larry Cipriani, AT&T Network Systems and Ohio State University
Domain: lvc@tut.cis.ohio-state.edu
Path: ...!cbosgd!osu-cis!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!lvc (weird but right)