Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!lll-winken!lll-lcc!ames!oliveb!epimass!csi!jwhitnel
From: jwhitnel@csi.UUCP (Jerry Whitnell)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: standards development process
Message-ID: <1477@csib.csi.UUCP>
Date: 14 Apr 88 00:25:37 GMT
References: <10314@tut.cis.ohio-state.edu> <1509@se-sd.sandiego.NCR.COM>
Reply-To: jwhitnel@csib.UUCP (Jerry Whitnell)
Organization: Communications Solutions Inc., San Jose, Ca
Lines: 18

In article <1509@se-sd.sandiego.NCR.COM> rns@se-sd.sandiego.NCR.COM (Rick Schubert) writes:
>In article <10314@tut.cis.ohio-state.edu> lvc@tut.cis.ohio-state.edu (Lawrence V. Cipriani) writes:
>> ...
>>Actually, as long as noalias was removed I would be content (but not
>>overjoyed) to use ANSI-C.  
>
>When and if there is an ANSI C Standard that contains "noalias", feel
>free to write programs that do not contain the token "noalias".

Yes, but what about the programmers who write the code that I'll be
maintaining?  How can I make sure they don't use noalias as well?  Shoot
them?

>
>-- Rick Schubert

Jerry Whitnell				Been through Hell?
Communication Solutions, Inc.		What did you bring back for me?
						- A. Brilliant