Xref: utzoo comp.misc:2204 rec.games.chess:961
Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!att-cb!att-ih!pacbell!ames!ll-xn!mit-eddie!bbn!rochester!udel!princeton!phoenix!pucc!LINDHOLM
From: LINDHOLM@pucc.Princeton.EDU (Eric Lindholm)
Newsgroups: comp.misc,rec.games.chess
Subject: Re: Incredible reports about the HITECH II chess automaton vs. IGM players
Message-ID: <4824@pucc.Princeton.EDU>
Date: 2 Apr 88 19:01:37 GMT
References: <490@eos.UUCP>
Reply-To: LINDHOLM@pucc.Princeton.EDU
Organization: Princeton University, NJ
Lines: 17
Disclaimer: Author bears full responsibility for contents of this article

In article <490@eos.UUCP>, jaw@eos.UUCP (James A. Woods) writes:
 
[Rather interesting but obviously first-of-April-inspired story
deleted]
 
> ...they were getting really lopsided results against "old HITECH",
>like 87-0-4 win-loss-draw in testing.
 
A disappointment.  I thought you were going to give us the traditional
"Hey gang this is April fool's in case you hadn't caught on yet" clue,
by making the score 88-1-4.
 
>James A. Woods
 
Eric C. Lindholm
6106306@PUCC (bitnet)
"No place is safe for the naive."