Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!lll-winken!csustan!polyslo!csun!csuna!aeusemrs From: aeusemrs@csuna.UUCP (Mike Stump) Newsgroups: comp.os.minix Subject: Re: Public Domain version of: yes(1) Message-ID: <1130@csuna.UUCP> Date: 7 Apr 88 03:25:55 GMT References: <26369@amdahl.uts.amdahl.com> <2561@bsu-cs.UUCP> <4571@chinet.UUCP> <1896@louie.u Reply-To: aeusemrs@csuna.UUCP (Mike Stump) Organization: California State University, Northridge Lines: 10 In article <1896@louie.udel.EDU> klaiber@udel.EDU (Alexander Klaiber) writes: -Well, if true(1) is proprietary and contans no code, then every other -program written contains the code for true(1) and hence violates copyright -laws.... maybe that way, AT&T will get back its millions? - -Alexander Klaiber Well, one would be in violation only if one had done a cat /bin/true >>myfile -- Mike Stump, Cal State Univ, Northridge Comp Sci Department uucp: {sdcrdcf, ihnp4, hplabs, ttidca, psivax, csustan}!csun!csuna!aeusemrs