Xref: utzoo comp.protocols.tcp-ip:2995 comp.protocols.iso:73
Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!lll-winken!lll-tis!ames!ucsd!nosc!tetra!budden
From: budden@tetra.NOSC.MIL (Rex A. Buddenberg)
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.tcp-ip,comp.protocols.iso
Subject: Re: SLIP working group?
Message-ID: <674@tetra.NOSC.MIL>
Date: 1 Apr 88 23:46:16 GMT
References: <1966@hou2d.UUCP> <1016@thumper.bellcore.com> <9312@tut.cis.ohio-state.edu>
Reply-To: budden@tetra.nosc.mil.UUCP (Rex A. Buddenberg)
Organization: Naval Ocean Systems Center, San Diego
Lines: 10

In article <9312@tut.cis.ohio-state.edu> pritch@tut.cis.ohio-state.edu (Norm Pritchett) writes:
[...]
>representative to ANSI and ISO touched upon the subject and confirmed
>it is in fact true.  He said the purpose of these committees is to
>produce a solution that makes technical sense AND places all parties
>involved at equal DISadvantage, this concept making more sense in a
                   ^^^
Is this why ISO uses the acronym for Draft International Standard?
:-)

b