Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!lll-winken!lll-lcc!ames!pasteur!ucbvax!ANDREW.CMU.EDU!ddp+
From: ddp+@ANDREW.CMU.EDU (Drew Daniel Perkins)
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.tcp-ip
Subject: Re: CRC calculation costs (was Re: SLIP working group? )
Message-ID: <8WJzWIy00UoJQ1H8o4@andrew.cmu.edu>
Date: 4 Apr 88 20:56:52 GMT
References: <8803302136.AA02360@larry.cs.washington.edu>
Sender: usenet@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Organization: The Internet
Lines: 8

> *Excerpts from: 30-Mar-88 Re: CRC calculation costs (..*
> *Randy@larry.cs.washingto (680)*

> I'm interested by your statements that checksuming is a very small part of
> the procotcol processing.
That is not what I said.  What I said was that the cost was "low" when using an
incremental table driven CRC computation at asyncronous line speeds (9600 baud).

Drew