Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!mcvax!unido!rmi!shimoda
From: shimoda@rmi.UUCP (Markus Schmidt)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga
Subject: Re: CEBIT Commodore Announcements (A2500, A3000)
Message-ID: <950@rmi.UUCP>
Date: 31 Mar 88 21:00:11 GMT
References: <7735@oberon.USC.EDU> <375@brambo.UUCP> <3533@cbmvax.UUCP>
Reply-To: shimoda@rmi.UUCP (Markus Schmidt)
Organization: RMI Net, Aachen, W.Germany
Lines: 24

In article <3533@cbmvax.UUCP> schein@cbmvax.UUCP (Dan Schein CATS) writes:
: 
:    The 2500 series Amiga's -=> ARE <=- 2000's with a combination of boards
:    added to them. The new chip set was designed to replace the chip set used
:    in the A500 and B2000. Commodore has not forgotten the A1000, but in the
:     Call BERKS AMIGA BBS - 24 Hrs - 3/12/2400 Baud - 40Meg - 215/678-7691
: +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
:         I help Commodore by supporting the AMIGA. Commodore supports
:          me by allowing me to form my own suggestions and comments.


Hi!

Hmmm, maybe I am stupid and maybe that this question was answered
somewhen.
Is there a difference in using the new hardware (UX, AT, Chips) 
in an A2002\0 and B2000? 
I would be *very* unhappy if I could not use some of the stuff in
my early-days-2000!

|._,|   Cu
 - -    Markus
==O==   (shimoda@rmi.UUCP)
 `-'    Never trust a smiling cat!