Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!mcvax!ukc!eagle!gos!rpa
From: rpa@gos.ukc.ac.uk (R.P.Almeida)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga
Subject: Re: CEBIT Commodore Announcements (A2500, A3000)
Message-ID: <1396@gos.ukc.ac.uk>
Date: 10 Apr 88 18:31:25 GMT
References: <7735@oberon.USC.EDU> <375@brambo.UUCP> <3533@cbmvax.UUCP> <950@rmi.UUCP>
Reply-To: rpa@ukc.ac.uk (R.P.Almeida)
Organization: Computing Lab, University of Kent at Canterbury, UK.
Lines: 21

In article <950@rmi.UUCP> shimoda@rmi.UUCP (Markus Schmidt) writes:
-In article <3533@cbmvax.UUCP> schein@cbmvax.UUCP (Dan Schein CATS) writes:
>: 
>:    The 2500 series Amiga's -=> ARE <=- 2000's with a combination of boards
>:    added to them. The new chip set was designed to replace the chip set used
>:    in the A500 and B2000. Commodore has not forgotten the A1000, but in the

-
-Is there a difference in using the new hardware (UX, AT, Chips) 
-in an A2002\0 and B2000? 
-I would be *very* unhappy if I could not use some of the stuff in
-my early-days-2000!
-

I am very unhappy, because Im sure that i can not use the new chips
in my early-days-2000, and that i'm going to lose 512K when i use
the 68020/68881/U**X board.

 Is Commodore(EUROPE/UK) going to do anything about this ?

	Richard Almeida.