Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!lll-winken!lll-tis!ames!ll-xn!mit-eddie!uw-beaver!tektronix!tekgen!tekigm2!phils From: phils@tekigm2.TEK.COM (Philip E Staub) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga Subject: Re: Why is there a mount but no unmount? Message-ID: <2821@tekigm2.TEK.COM> Date: 13 Apr 88 05:29:20 GMT References: <4643@garfield.UUCP> <242@ssbell.UUCP> <2810@tekigm2.TEK.COM> <5671@well.UUCP> Reply-To: phils@tekigm2.UUCP (Philip E Staub) Organization: Tektronix, Inc., Beaverton, OR. Lines: 34 Keywords: mount unmount path In article <5671@well.UUCP> ewhac@well.UUCP (Leo 'Bols Ewhac' Schwab) writes: phils@tekigm2.UUCP (Philip E Staub) writes: <>In article <242@ssbell.UUCP> chris@ssbell.UUCP (0000-Chris Olson) writes: <>>Does anyone out there know of any GOOD reason that commodore <>>forgot to supply an unmount command to go with the mount? <> <>Imagine the following scenario: your Amiga has several processes running <>which have at one time or another accessed the mounted drive in one way or <>another and thereby created a lock on a diretory or file on that drive. <> < He goes on to suppose that these programs have obtained locks on !{well,unicom}!ewhac