Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!cmcl2!nrl-cmf!ames!oliveb!sun!pepper!cmcmanis
From: cmcmanis%pepper@Sun.COM (Chuck McManis)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga
Subject: Re: Maximum array size in Lattice 4.0
Message-ID: <49386@sun.uucp>
Date: 13 Apr 88 17:43:57 GMT
References: <692@kuling.UUCP>
Sender: news@sun.uucp
Reply-To: cmcmanis@sun.UUCP (Chuck McManis)
Organization: Sun Microsystems, Mountain View
Lines: 19

In article <692@kuling.UUCP> jonasf@kuling.UUCP (Jonas Flygare) writes:
>
>Well, maybe I'm just plain stupid, or something, but if any of you people 
>"out there" have an intelligent answer to this, I would be very grateful.
>I have been cursing over a program for a while now, and the trouble is
>the compiler barfs on an array of ints, with a size of almost 70000.

In the 4.0 release (currently 4.01 call the BBS for the update) the options
for base address data references was changed. It use to default to false
now it defaults to true. That means your BSS size couldn't be more than 
64K (+/- 32K). The fix is easy, compile it with the -b1 switch which will
turn this mode off and address everything with 32 bit addresses. 
Read the manual under the section 'compiler features' or some such for
a description of these issues.


--Chuck McManis
uucp: {anywhere}!sun!cmcmanis   BIX: cmcmanis  ARPAnet: cmcmanis@sun.com
These opinions are my own and no one elses, but you knew that didn't you.