Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!bellcore!faline!thumper!ulysses!ucbvax!CORY.BERKELEY.EDU!dillon
From: dillon@CORY.BERKELEY.EDU (Matt Dillon)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.tech
Subject: Re: Execute? Yes but!
Message-ID: <8804071842.AA04690@cory.Berkeley.EDU>
Date: 7 Apr 88 18:42:54 GMT
Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Lines: 16

>My second idea: use LoadSeg/CreatProc/WBStartup/UnLoadSeg etc. ok, it seems
>that C-A forgot that a process might return a return value to WorkBench.
>Change the startup/exit protocol by adding this to the message? NO that
>would break WorkBench. OK no return value from WB. What else???
>
>My third idea: this works but is dirty, uses inside info on Dos etc.
>
>Your idea?   Any official / compatible solution?
	
	If you find my shell source (*not* the drew version), it has two
modules that handle loading and running a program and getting the return
value.

	It's a mess.  Most of the mess is to allow for running BCPL program.

					-Matt