Xref: utzoo comp.sys.amiga.tech:296 comp.sys.amiga:17633
Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!lll-winken!lll-tis!ames!pasteur!agate!eris!doug
From: doug@eris (Doug Merritt)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.tech,comp.sys.amiga
Subject: Re: IPC: Messages (again) [+ -- Oopsie.]
Message-ID: <8723@agate.BERKELEY.EDU>
Date: 14 Apr 88 08:14:14 GMT
References: <7685@agate.BERKELEY.EDU> <806@nuchat.UUCP> <7929@agate.BERKELEY.EDU> <8250@agate.BERKELEY.EDU> <895@nuchat.UUCP> <8720@agate.BERKELEY.EDU>
Sender: usenet@agate.BERKELEY.EDU
Reply-To: doug@eris.UUCP (Doug Merritt)
Organization: University of California, Berkeley
Lines: 10
Keywords: IPC Message Format

In article <8720@agate.BERKELEY.EDU> pete@violet.berkeley.edu.UUCP (Pete Goodeve) writes:
>So -- do we actually have an agreed message format?  Can we start using it?
>Can we persuade anyone else to start using it?

Hey, if the dust is finally starting to clear, I'd like to see
what the current model looks like in a nutshell.

That should go a long way towards persuading others.

	Doug Merritt		doug@mica.berkeley.edu (ucbvax!mica!doug)
			or	ucbvax!unisoft!certes!doug