Xref: utzoo comp.sys.ibm.pc:14133 comp.sys.mac:14806 Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!seismo!sundc!pitstop!sun!decwrl!decvax!dartvax!eleazar!merchant From: merchant@eleazar.Dartmouth.EDU (Peter Merchant) Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc,comp.sys.mac Subject: Re: Apple Challenges HP New Wave, MS-Windows, Potentially OS/2 PM Message-ID: <8539@eleazar.Dartmouth.EDU> Date: 4 Apr 88 14:19:00 GMT References: <5480@well.UUCP> <5492@well.UUCP> <535@nunki.usc.edu> <9584@ism780c.UUCP> Organization: U.S. Merchant Marine Academy, Kings Point, NY Lines: 44 In article <9584@ism780c.UUCP>, T.W."Tim" Smith writes: > A point you all seem to be missing is that Microsoft's Windows *IS* > a Mac look-alike and that Sun's and Amiga's ( and MIT's, while we > are at it ) don't look like Mac windows. And the Mac interface > doesn't feel like the Xerox one. > > Looking at the various window systems in question here, I would > guess that the part you can't protect is the idea of windows, > icons, and mice. But there are a lot of elaboration on the > basic idea that the maker of a window system must make, e.g., > how do you grow windows, where do you put menus, how do you > close windows, do they tile or overlap, are icons used to > represent files only or do they also represent devices, > do you have a cute little trash can to throw files in, how > do you move windows, how do scroll bars work, etc. > > Looking at Amiga windows, Sun windows, Mac windows, and > Xerox windows, we see four different answers to most of > these questions. Looking at Microsoft windows, we see > an answer that we already saw: Mac windows. Hm. I've been playing with Windows 2.03 and Microsoft has come up with different ways to do things, usually involving the window control menu, which is a pop-up menu located where the close box is on a Macintosh. Thus, if I want to move a window, I can go to the window control menu and select "Move" and then the window outline will follow my mouse. However, since that is too much work, I can also just go to the title bar of the window and drag it around, just like a Macintosh. If I click on a menu, it comes down and I can select the item that I want by clicking on it, or I can hold down the mouse button and work it just like a Macintosh. If nothing else, the worse that would happen is that Microsoft remove some of these shortcuts... I don't think Apple is trying to shoot all windowing systems and claim that they are the only people allowed to do a windowing system. I think their aim, and it is legitimate in my eyes, is to keep people from pilfering the Macintosh window system and it's look-and-feel. Also, I was intrigued to read, in Infoworld, about IBM/Microsoft's specs for "panel displays" using The Presentation Manager. It reads just like a page out of Apple's User Interface Guidelines, except that ther phrases are all changed around, for example, dialog boxes are called panels. This strikes a bit close to home, I think. --- "Your moves are so raw..." Peter Merchant (merchant@eleazar.UUCP)