Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!lll-winken!lll-tis!ames!mailrus!umix!umich!mibte!gamma!ulysses!thumper!faline!bellcore!tness7!petro!swrinde!ut-sally!utah-cs!utah-gr!stride!tahoe!unsvax!tlhingan
From: tlhingan@unsvax.UUCP (Eugene Tramaglino)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc
Subject: Binaries: ARC vs PKARC vs ZOO
Message-ID: <230@unsvax.UUCP>
Date: 3 Apr 88 18:55:12 GMT
References: <23699@clyde.ATT.COM> <1805@pasteur.Berkeley.Edu> <1685@polyslo.UUCP>
Reply-To: tlhingan@unsvax.uucp (Eugene Tramaglino)
Organization: University of Nevada System Computing Center
Lines: 14

I think that I would have no major objection to using ZOO as an archive
format, IF it (the ZOO program) was made available IN ADVANCE of
standardizing.  Why can't we simply send everyone a copy of ZOO?
Note: I have not used ZOO.  I have used ARC and pkarc.  

Personal Note: I cannot stand pkarc.  I prefer ARC's one (1) program
that does the job just as well.  I don't like invoking different
commands to 'v' an archive and 'e' an archive.

#==============================================#=========================#
# Eugene Tramaglino -- tlhingan@unsvax.uns.edu # USS Mahagonny, NCC-1929 #
#   1450 E Harmon 207A, Las Vegas, NV 89119    #=========================#
#   Data:  "All paths are equally dangerous."  #  Member, Institute of   #
#   Riker: "Let's go!"                         #   General Semantics.    #
#==============================================#=========================#