Xref: utzoo comp.sys.mac:14755 comp.text:1750 Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!bbn!rochester!PT.CS.CMU.EDU!cadre!pitt!jonathan From: jonathan@pitt.UUCP (Jonathan S. Eunice) Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac,comp.text Subject: Re: Dissertation on a MAC vs UNIX Message-ID: <3164@pitt.UUCP> Date: 4 Apr 88 09:18:49 GMT References: <2328@uvacs.CS.VIRGINIA.EDU> Reply-To: jonathan@vax.cs.pittsburgh.edu.UUCP (Jonathan S. Eunice) Organization: University of Pittsburgh Computer Science Lines: 35 Keywords: bibliographies, index(es), table of contents, Summary: Both fine, Mac nice but fewer helpers Harry S. Delugach writes: > Is there any Mac software that matches the functionality of *troff > and family? MS Word is easy to learn and use, and makes nice-looking documents. The page preview feature is esp. nice. Outlines are claimed, but not very good. It does footnotes well, but does not provide many of the other services you're probably used to from -mX macro packages and the troff front-ends. Making tables (with MacDraw or similar) is particularly painful compared to tbl. Equations are possible but you'll need one of the equation-making programs if you're going to do anything fancy. There is no automatic bibliography/citation support, but it isn't too bad to do manually. Displays are more difficult. Complex parametric figures (as in pic) are not possible, but simple figures are very easy to specify in one of the Draw or Paint programs. Large documents will probably have to be split into several files. They are from two different worlds \(em the embedded command world, and the WYSIWYG world. The flame.wars will begin with the comp.sys.mac people saying: Go with Word. The comp.text people: Go with troff, TeX, usw. Personally, I use both for technical writing, and find both acceptable. Troff/Unix has some real advantages for long documents, in that you can do many things automatically with little sed/awk/etc scripts or troff-helpers that you must do by hand on the Macintosh. The Mac is simpler, though, and doesn't force you do work at such a low level. Most working time is changing the text, not formatting/setting for output. If you have a workstation (or a Mac) with a large screen available, that is probably more important to the ease of editing than which text processor you use. I've also been pretty successful straddling the line, using both for the same document, transferring between formats. If you don't use over-complex formatting, the translation is not really that great, except for tables, figures, and equations. It's easier to go from Mac to Unix, btw.