Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!lll-winken!lll-lcc!ames!elroy!cit-vax!tybalt.caltech.edu!woody From: woody@tybalt.caltech.edu (William Edward Woody) Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.programmer Subject: Re: Motorola manuals Message-ID: <6001@cit-vax.Caltech.Edu> Date: 2 Apr 88 01:09:08 GMT References: <5473@spool.cs.wisc.edu> <104700019@uiucdcsp> <1294@iscuva.ISCS.COM> Sender: news@cit-vax.Caltech.Edu Reply-To: woody@tybalt.caltech.edu.UUCP (William Edward Woody) Organization: California Institute of Technology Lines: 36 In article <1294@iscuva.ISCS.COM> jimc@iscuva.ISCS.COM (Jim Cathey) writes: >In article <104700019@uiucdcsp> gillies@uiucdcsp.cs.uiuc.edu writes: >>Motorola is very poor at documenting their chips. >Motorola documents them well, so far as I have seen. Of course you have >to _get_ their documentation. We have no trouble finding these manuals. Did you _call_ Motorola themselves? One day about a year ago, I wanted to get my hands on the 68020 and the 68881 manuals. So after calling all the bookstores in town, I called Motorola. (Got their number from OpAmp Technical Books here in LA.) When I called, I remember the conversation being something like: me: "I'd like to get my hands on any programming manuals for the 68020 and the 68881 processor chips." them: "No problem. I need your name and address." me: Giving them my name and my (at that time) Caltech mailing address. them: "Thank you. You should get it in a few weeks." --click-- me: "Don't you wan't any of the usual payment information???" (The phone is dead at this point.) And a few weeks later, I recieved the "MC68020 32-Bit Microprocessor User's Manual", the "MC68881 Floating-Point Coprocessor User's Manual", the "MC68851 Paged Memory Management Unit User's Manual" (which I didn't ask for but certainly appreciated) -- all for free, along with about a half-inch of promotional material for the MC68020. (You know, the flyers which usually appear in magazines promoting how nifty their stuff is.) Some days I just get lucky. But it _does_ pay to call around... ;-) (And no, it wasn't a billing problem; the invoice was marked _paid in full_, with payment due being $0.00.) Maybe they thought I was a student (a correct assumption) or a researcher? - William Edward Woody woody@tybalt.caltech.edu (Mac>][n&&/|\)&&(MacII>AT) Disclamer: I haven't the foggiest idea what I'm talking about...