Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!lll-winken!lll-tis!ames!pasteur!ucbvax!VENERA.ISI.EDU!braden
From: braden@VENERA.ISI.EDU
Newsgroups: comp.sys.proteon
Subject: Re:  "host routes"
Message-ID: <8804071831.AA03822@braden.isi.edu>
Date: 7 Apr 88 18:31:37 GMT
Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Organization: The Internet
Lines: 7

The solution to this may be bureacratic, not technical. When Hedrick's
RIP RFC  F*I*N*A*L*L*Y gets published (and I have reason to believe that
will be soon), we will have a protocol document for RIP. Either it
legitimizes host routes, or it doesn't (I don't know the answer). If it
does, we can tell Proteon they are not implementing RIP.  If not, we
can tell whoever is sending that host route that they are broken.

Bob Braden